Washington eBulletin – June 2019

A Look Ahead

ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ Supports Greater Access to Office of Legal Counsel Opinions

ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ joined a coalition of organizations on aÌýletterÌýto the House and Senate Appropriations Committees asking them to include language in their Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies (CJS) appropriations bills to require the Department of Justice to provide a list of the titles, authors, and dates of issuance of all final Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) opinions.

OLC is tasked with providing authoritative legal advice to the president, the Attorney General, and other executive branch agencies. However, the executive branch often withholds from Congress and the public even the most basic information about their reports, such as when and to whom they are issued, the subject of their analyses, and even how many are currently in effect. This hinders Congressional oversight as well as public knowledge of the OLC’s work.

Due to national security and privacy concerns, not allÌýOLC opinions can or should be released to the public without any redactions. However, other government agencies with similar national security and privacy requirementsÌýhave found workable solutions to provide information about their reports. For example, the Department of Defense Inspector General and the Government Accountability Office release information, such as a report title or report number, in cases when some or all of a report’s contents must remain nonpublic.

While the House Appropriations Committee marked up its FY 2020 CJS bill on May 22, the Senate Appropriations Committee has not yet marked up its bill.ÌýWe urge the Committee to require the Department of Justice to begin reporting a list of all final opinions.

Act Now

Survey on U.S. Code Annual Supplements

ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ is working with theÌýÌýand theÌýÌý(OLRC) of the U.S. House of Representatives to conduct aÌýÌýof ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ members on the use of the United States Code (USC) and its supplements. OLRC is the office that produces the USC. The office is investigating whether the USC can be produced more efficiently by eliminating printed USC annual supplements.

All ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ members are welcome to complete this survey, including those who completed a similar survey for the Federal Depository Library Program. The OLRC wants to continue to serve the needs of its users, and your completion of the survey will provide important feedback.

±Ê±ô±ð²¹²õ±ðÌý. You mayÌýsee a copy of the survey before you begin.

ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ in the States

UELMA Enacted in Iowa and Texas

Submitted by John Edwards and Lynn Murray

Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds signed the Uniform Electronic Legal Material Act (UELMA) on May 8. ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ Members Karen Wallace, Rebecca Lutkenhaus, and John Edwards were instrumental in the enactment. They worked with Drake’s Legislative Practice Center, Commissioner David Walker (Drake Emeriti Law Professor), Representative Jon Jacobsen, and others. The advocates .

In Texas, thanks to the tireless efforts of ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ past president Barbara Bintliff, Governor GregÌýAbbottÌýsigned UELMAÌýon May 24.ÌýFor three legislative sessions, Barbara recruited legislative sponsors, and she provided testimony about the importance of UELMA at committee hearings. One story she shares from the 2017 legislative session relates how she won over the Secretary of State causing him to drop his opposition mere minutes before their testimony at one committee hearing.ÌýBarbara was assisted by the legislative clinic at UT, and she enjoyed the universal backing of library associations, both law and non-law, who all endorsed the adoption of UELMA.

UELMA has been enacted in 21 states and the District of Columbia.

GPLLA Volunteers with Books through Bars

Submitted by Janet Peros

On Saturday, May 18th, a Greater Philadelphia Law Library Association (GPLLA) contingent volunteered at Books Through Bars in Philadelphia selecting books requested and packaging books to send to incarcerated individuals in PA and neighboring states after a brief orientation.

Those that attended felt it was a rewarding experience and we are hoping to make this a regular/ongoing event (every few months) so that others in our chapter might also get involved.

Roundup and Review

  • The Depository Library Council delivered itsÌýÌýto GPO. The brief expresses gratitude to ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ for its advocacy to ensure continued publication of theÌýFederal RegisterÌý²¹²Ô»åÌýCode of Federal Regulations indexes.
  • The House Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress made its first , putting forth ideas to improve access to bills and votes.

Washington eBulletin – May 2019

A Look Ahead

Despite White House Calls to Eliminate Funding, Legal Services Corporation Proposes Budget Increase

For the third consecutive year, President Trump has for the Legal Services Corporation (LSC), the independent nonprofit established by Congress in 1974 to provide financial support for civil legal aid to low-income Americans. The proposal to defund LSC comes as LSC celebrates its 45th anniversary as theÌýnation’s single largest funder of civil legal aid.

As the need for legal assistance grows, law libraries and legal information professionals are taking on new roles and services to support the administration of justice and provide access to trustworthy legal information. LSC promotes innovative partnerships and collaborations with other funders of civil legal aid, allowing providers to make the best use of limited dollars. DefundingÌýLSC would threaten equitable access to information and access to justice for millions of Americans.

Fortunately, the President’s budget is a proposal, not law; the U.S. Constitution designates the “power of the purse” as a function of Congress.ÌýIn Fiscal Year 2019,ÌýCongress funded LSC at $415 million, $5 million more than FY 2018 and a $30 million increase over FY 2017. This year, LSC has submitted a forÌý$593 million, an increase over last year’s request of $564.8 million.

In reaction to the President’s proposal, , “I believe that the bipartisan support LSC has enjoyed in Congress for almost 45 years will continue long into the future. We are grateful that Congress recognizes LSC’s vital importance in ensuring equal access to justice and has increased our funding in each of the last two fiscal years.”

Continuous improvement in access to justice is one of ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ’s core values and one our public policy priorities. ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ will continue to support full funding for LSC.

Act Now

ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ Day on the Hill / Register Now — Limited Spaces Remain

Join ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ on Capitol Hill to influence information policy issues and harness our collective voice for the profession. You’ll learn about the information policy issues on ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ’s agenda and how to successfully advocate for law libraries. Then take our message to Capitol Hill for meetings with your members of Congress and their staff.ÌýThis year marks for ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ; help us celebrate our anniversaryÌýby demonstrating the strength and expertise of the Association and our members.

DETAILS
  • Friday, July 12 / 8:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. EDT
  • Marriott Marquis / Washington, DC
  • Register by Friday, May 17
  • Open to ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ members only – Free
  • Agenda now available

ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ in the States

SWALL Renews Support for UELMA

The Southwestern Association of Law Libraries (SWALL) recently reauthorized its support for the Uniform Electronic Legal Material Act (UELMA) through an updatedÌýUELMA resolution, encouraging enactment of UELMA in Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas.

Roundup and Review

  • ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ President Femi Cadmus submitted testimony to the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on the Legislative Branch in support of the funding requests of the Government Publishing Office and Library of Congress.
  • Recordings of theÌý are now available.

Washington eBulletin – April 2019

A Look Ahead

ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ President to Testify Before the House Appropriations Subcommittee TodayÌý

ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ President Femi Cadmus will this afternoon before theÌýU.S. House of Representatives Appropriations Subcommittee on theÌýLegislative Branch in support of the funding requests of the Government Publishing Office (GPO) and Library of Congress.ÌýCadmus’ Ìýcalls for full funding of the requested $31.3 million for the GPO’s Public Information Programs account that supports the Federal Depository Library Program. She will also request support for the Law Library of Congress’ $18 million request so that it may complete its project to archive its global legal research reports and continue its digitization efforts. The hearing is expected to begin at 1:30 p.m. Eastern and Cadmus is scheduled to be the first witness.Ìý.

Bicameral Net Neutrality Bill IntroducedÌý

House and Senate lawmakers introduced the Save the Internet Act (/) to restore the strong protections for net neutrality and broadband access guaranteed by the 2015 Open Internet Order. The Federal Communications Commission voted to repeal the Open Internet Order in late 2017 despiteÌýand many others.

The Save the Internet Act was voted out of the House Energy and Commerce Communications and Technology Subcommittee last week and faces a full Committee vote this week.ÌýÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ strongly supports the legislation and urges theÌýHouse to pass the bill without any harmful amendments or attempts to weaken it.

Act Now

ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ Day on the Hill / Agenda Now Available

to influence information policy issues and harness our collective voice for the profession. You’ll learn about the information policy issues on ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ’s agenda and how to successfully advocate for law libraries. Then take our message to Capitol Hill for meetings with your members of Congress and their staff.ÌýThis year marks for ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ; Ìýby demonstrating the strength and expertise of the Association and our members.

DETAILS

  • Friday, July 12 / 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. EDT
  • Marriott Marquis / Washington, DC
  • by Friday, May 17
  • Open to ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ members only – Free
  • 80-person limit

Roundup and Review

  • Karyn Temple was by Librarian of Congress Carla Hayden.
  • Sunshine Week (March 10-16) featured a Ìýat the National Archives and Records Administration.

Washington eBulletin – March 2019

A Look Ahead

Bill to Free PACER Reintroduced in the HouseÌý

ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµÌýapplaudedÌýthe introduction of the Electronic Court Records Reform Act (), introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on February 13, 2019 by House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Doug Collins (R-Ga.) and Congressman Mike Quigley (D-Ill.), chair of the Congressional Transparency Caucus. This legislation would, for the first time, allow free access to electronic federal court records through the Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system and improve the efficiency and transparency of the courts.

ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ coordinated a letterÌýsigned by 15 other organizations–including the American Civil Liberties Union, the Data Coalition, and the Project on Government Oversight–urging passage of the bill. In addition,Ìýthe Association of Law Libraries of Upstate New York and the Law Library Association of Greater New York, along withÌýindividual law libraries in House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler’s (D-NY) district, wrote to the House Judiciary Committee urging the Committee to hold a markup of the bill as soon as possible.

Congress Considers Agency Funding Levels for Fiscal Year 2020

While the funding fight for fiscal year (FY) 2019 only just concluded, Congress is already well into considering the FY 2020 requests of federal agencies.

On February 27, the Government Publishing Office’s (GPO) Acting Deputy Director Herb Jackson before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on the Legislative Branch about the GPO’sÌý$117 millionÌýrequest. During the hearing, Jackson announced his upcoming March 31 retirement.ÌýOn March 7, Librarian of Congress Carla Hayden will about funding for the Library of Congress, including the Law Library of Congress.

ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ carefully tracks the appropriations requests of GPO and the Library of Congress, as well as theÌýthe Institute of Museum and Library Services and the National Archives and Records Administration. These agencies support the lifecycle of government information, including greater permanent public access and preservation.

Act Now

ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ Day on the Hill / Registration Now Open

Join ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ on Capitol Hill to influence information policy issues and harness our collective voice for the profession. You’ll learn about the information policy issues on ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ’s agenda and how to successfully advocate for law libraries and then take our message to Capitol Hill for meetings with your members of Congress and their staff. This year marks for ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ; help us celebrate our anniversaryÌýby demonstrating the strength and expertise of the Association and our members.

DETAILS

  • Friday, July 12 / 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. EDT
  • Marriott Marquis / Washington, DC
  • Register by Friday, May 17
  • Open to ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ members only – Free
  • 80-person limit

Roundup and Review

  • ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ .
  • The National Archives and Records Administration isÌý, as recommended by ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ and others.
  • On February 1, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ÌýinÌýMozilla Corporation v. FCC, the case challenging the FCC’s decision to overturn Obama-era net neutrality rules.
  • GPO becameÌýthe first organization in the United States and second organization in the world to of excellence for digital repositories.

Washington eBulletin – February 2019

A Look Ahead

New Congress Considers Transparency Legislation

While Congress spent much of January focused on reopening the federal government from the longest shutdown in history, theÌýHouse of Representatives and Senate continued to attend to the daily business of legislating–including holding hearings and passing bills.

On January 17, ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ celebrated passage of the bipartisanÌýGrant Reporting Efficiency and Agreements Transparency (GREAT) ActÌý() in the House. The GREAT Act would modernize federal grant reporting and increase transparency for grant-making agencies and the public. It awaits action in the Senate.ÌýÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ also applauded the reintroduction of the Access to Congressionally Mandated Reports Act (, )Ìýto improve access to reports mandated by Congress through the establishment of a searchable central website managed by the Government Publishing Office. This bipartisan, bicameral legislationÌýwas introduced by Senator Rob Portman (R-Ohio) and Rep. Mike Quigley (D-Ill.) on January 19 and January 23,Ìýrespectively.

These legislative actions come on the heels of the enactment of the OPEN Government Data Act, which was signed by President Trump on January 14 as part of the Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act (). The new law promotes greater distribution of and public access to federal government data by defining data, machine-reliability, and open license in government; creating standards for making federal government data available to the public; and requiring the federal government to use open data to improve decision-making.

While the second round of negotiations to fund the government for the current fiscal year will undoubtedly dominate the headlines in the coming weeks, ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ expects the introduction of additional legislation supporting a more open and transparent government. Specifically,Ìýwe anticipate the reintroduction of the Electronic Court Records Reform ActÌýthatÌýwould improve the federal courts’ electronic records system and require that all federal court documents be searchable, machine-readable, and available free of charge through the Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system.

Act Now

ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ Day on the Hill / Registration Now Open

Join ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ on Capitol Hill to influence information policy issues and harness our collective voice for the profession. You’ll learn about the information policy issues on ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ’s agenda and how to successfully advocate for law libraries and then take our message to Capitol Hill for meetings with your members of Congress and their staff. This year marks 30 years of professional advocacy for ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ; help us celebrate our anniversaryÌýby demonstrating the strength and expertise of the Association and our members.

DETAILS

  • Friday, July 12 / 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. EDT
  • Marriott Marquis / Washington, DC
  • Register by Friday, May 17
  • Open to ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ members only – Free
  • 80-person limit

Roundup and Review

  • ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ issued an eBriefing on the impact of the partial federal government shutdown.
  • ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ joined the American Civil Liberties Union and several other organizations on anÌýamicus briefÌýsupporting the idea that the First Amendment guarantees the public a right of access to judicial records through PACER. The brief was filed in response to National Veterans Legal Services Program et al v. United States of America.
  • We submittedÌýcomments to the Copyright OfficeÌýon modernizing the Office’s registration system.

Washington eBulletin – January 2019

A Look Ahead

ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ Priorities in the New Congress

Today is the start of the 116th Congress, with all of the pomp and circumstance opening day brings to Capitol Hill.ÌýThere are more than 100 new members in this Congressional class, including forty lawyers.ÌýDuring the next few weeks, as Committee assignments are finalized, staff are hired, and members of Congress settle into their offices on Capitol Hill, we will shareÌýÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ’s Public Policy PrioritiesÌýwith Congressional offices and speak to staff about the importance ofÌýaccess to justice, balance in copyright law, greater access to government information, openness in government, and protection of privacy. You can help ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ’s advocacy efforts by getting to know your members of Congress and confidentially sharing any connections you have with your lawmakers via ourÌý.

We’re also assessing next steps after the 115th Congress took no further action on the FDLP Modernization Act () before adjourning, despite strong support from ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ and other library associations. ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ will continue advocating for modernization of the Federal Depository Library Program and work with Congress and the Government Publishing Office (GPO) to ensure the Program meets the needs of libraries and the public. While the 115th Congress did not act on the FDLP Modernization Act, it did approveÌýthe OPEN Government Data ActÌý(,Ìý)Ìýin one of its final actions. The bill promotes greater distribution of and public access to federal government data.

While the 116th Congress is expected to turn immediate attention to reopening the federal government and conducting aggressive oversight of the Executive Branch, legislators will likely soon begin pursuing legislation related to privacy, net neutrality, and access to information from all three branches of government. Stay informed about the latest policy news by joining theÌý, where you’ll receiveÌýweekly updates from the Government Relations Committee and timely alerts from the Government Relations Office.

Act Now

Join the ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ Advocacy Team

Now is the time to get to know your member of Congress, including their background, key issues, and legislative priorities. Visit ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ’sÌýLegislative Action CenterÌýto read their bios and link to their websites. Then follow them on social media and sign up for their newsletters to stay informed about their policy priorities and learn about opportunities for making your voice heard via in-district meetings, town halls, online surveys, or phone calls.

Already know your member of Congress? Perhaps you went to law school with one of your members, or know them or their family through community activities. If so, please let us know!ÌýÌýasks about any relationships you have with your members of Congress, your policy areas of interest, and on what issues you’d like to get more involved. We keep this information confidential and work with you to help use your connections to the best advantage. These “grasstops” connections are key to influencing members of Congress in support of our issues. Thanks in advance for helping ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ create a strong advocacy network.

Save the Date / ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ Day on the Hill

  • Friday, July 12, 2019
  • Washington, DC
  • Members – Free

Mark your calendars forÌýÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ Day on the Hill: Advocacy Leadership Training & Lobby Day, taking place just before the ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ Annual Meeting & Conference in Washington, DC. You’ll learn about the information policy issues on ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ’s agenda and how to successfully advocate for law libraries, and then take our message to Capitol Hill for meetings with your members of Congress and their staff. Issues may include copyright, access to legal information, open government, and privacy.ÌýRegistration forÌýÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ Day on the HillÌýwill open soon.

ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ in the States

ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ and Local Chapters Support Georgia County Law Libraries

ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ, the Atlanta Law Libraries Association, and the Southeastern Chapter of the ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµÌýwrote to the Access to Justice Committee of theÌýState Bar of Georgia to request itsÌýsupport to identify a strong, stable funding mechanism for Georgia county law libraries. Funding for Georgia’s county law libraries has not kept pace with today’s demands for trustworthy and timely access to legal information. Supporters of Georgia’s county law libraries are organizing support for a funding increase.

Michigan Enacts UELMA

The Uniform Electronic Legal Material Act (UELMA) was signed by MichiganÌýGovernor Rick Snyder on December 24, 2018, bringing the total number of UELMA enactments to 20. ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ thanks Michigan ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ member Jane Meland, Marlene Coir, and the Michigan Association of Law Libraries who contributed to this advocacy success by working with the Uniform Law Commissioners, testifying before the legislature, and organizing support for the Act. ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ has updated theÌýUELMA enactment chart and advocacy resources.

Roundup and Review

  • Libraries across the country celebrated Public Domain Day on January 1, 2019.ÌýDuke Law’s Center for the Study of the Public Domain provided aÌý, with a link to a fuller Excel spreadsheet.
  • GPO’s inspector general found that agency leadership violate federal laws, improperly hiring unqualified workers and engaging in cronyism.Ìý.
  • House Democrats introduced a rules package with transparency and modernization reforms.Ìý.

UELMA Enactments

UNIFORM ELECTRONIC LEGAL MATERIAL ACT ENACTMENTS

 

STATECOVERED LEGAL MATERIALSFISCAL IMPACT
ARIZONA

Bill number: SB 1414
Enacted: 5/17/2016
Effective: 8/8/2016

Constitution of Arizona

Arizona session laws

Arizona Revised Statutes

No fiscal impact
CALIFORNIA

Bill number: SB 1075
Enacted: 9/13/2012
Effective: 7/1/2015

California Constitution

California Statutes

California Codes

$135,000 to $165,000 (General Fund) for set up, authentication, archiving, and onsite storage.

Annual ongoing costs in the range of $40,000 to $70,000.

COLORADO

Bill number: HB 1209
Enacted: 4/26/2012
Effective: 3/31/2014

Colorado Constitution

Session Laws of Colorado

Colorado Revised Statutes

State agency rules with effect of law

$198,912
CONNECTICUT

Bill number: SB 235
Enacted: 5/17/2013
Effective: 10/1/2014

Constitution of Connecticut

General Statutes of Connecticut

Regulations of Connecticut state agencies

Reported decisions of Connecticut Supreme Court, Connecticut Appellate Court, and
Connecticut Superior Court

No fiscal impact
DELAWARE

Bill number: HB 403
Enacted: 7/23/2014
Effective: 10/21/2014

Constitution of Delaware

Laws of Delaware

Delaware Code

Regulations published in the Delaware

Administrative Code

No fiscal impact
HAWAII

Bill number: SB 32/HB 18
Enacted: 4/16/2013
Effective: 7/1/2013

Hawaii Constitution

Hawaii Session Laws

Hawaii Revised Statutes

State agency rules with effect of law

Reported decisions of Supreme Court of State of Hawaii and Intermediate Appellate Court of Hawaii

State court rules

No fiscal impact
IDAHO

Bill number: S 1356
Enacted: 3/26/2014
Effective: 7/1/2015

Idaho Constitution

Idaho Session Laws

Idaho Code

Idaho Administrative Code and Administrative Bulletin

Reported decisions of Idaho Supreme Court and Idaho Court of Appeals

Idaho court rules

No fiscal impact
ILLINOIS

Bill number: SB 1941
Enacted: 8/26/2014
Effective: 1/1/2015

Illinois Constitution

Laws of Illinois

Illinois Compiled Statutes

Illinois Administrative Code

Final administrative decisions

Reported decisions of Illinois Supreme Court, Illinois Appellate Court, and Illinois Court of Claims

Illinois Supreme Court rules

No fiscal impact
INDIANA

Bill number: SB 131
Enacted: 3/7/2022
Effective: 7/1/2022

The Constitution of the State of Indiana;

The Indiana Acts (session laws);

The Indiana Code;

An agency rule;

An official opinion of the attorney general;

An opinion of the court of appeals or the supreme court; or

Court rules adopted by the supreme court.

Legislative Services Agency (LSA): To the extent LSA cannot make the programming changes within existing resources, the LSA would incur a one-time expenditure for hiring an outside vendor for programming purposes. It is estimated that an outside programming vendor would cost between $30,000 and $50,000. Ongoing support costs are not anticipated based on the bill’s requirements.

Indiana Supreme Court: The Court could likely implement the bill’s provisions within existing resources and staffing levels.

Office of Attorney General (AG): The bill could increase the workload and expenditure of the AG. The AG reports that the cost would be nominal and would include licensing fees and limited manpower, depending on the number of files to be certified.

Additional InformationThe Indiana Archive and Records Administration provides assistance to state andlocal governments in creation, usage, storage, and disposition of governmental records.

IOWA

Bill number: HF 743
Enacted: 5/8/2019
Effective: 7/1/2019

The Constitution of the State of Iowa

The Iowa Acts

The Iowa Code

The Iowa Administrative Bulletin

The Iowa Administrative Code

No fiscal impact
MARYLAND

Bill number: SB 137/HB 165
Enacted: 5/3/2017
Effective: 10/1/2017

Maryland Constitution

Session Laws

Code of Maryland

Maryland Rules

Journal of the Senate of Maryland

Journal of the House of Delegates of Maryland

A Reported Decision of
• The Court of Appeals; or
• The Court of Special Appeals

An Opinion Issued by the Office of the Attorney General

Code of Maryland Regulations

A Final Decision in a Contested Case Issued by a Unit of State Government under the Administrative Procedure Act

Maryland Register

General fund expenditures for the
Department of Legislative Services
(DLS) increase by $28,500 in FY
2018 for hardware and software
associated with the bill’s
authentication requirement. Future year expenditures ($20,500) reflect ongoing costs.
MICHIGAN

Bill number: HB 4779
Enacted: 12/28/2018
Effective: 12/28/2018

The state constitution of 1963

The public acts of this state

The Michigan Compiled Laws

A rule promulgated pursuant to the administrative procedures act of 1969, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.201 to 24.328

Materials related to and created by the courts in this state as provided for in a cooperative agreement entered into under section 129

[The bill] could have an
indeterminate impact on the State
for any necessary costs associated
with information technology
updates to properly archive and
store the required legal materials.
The costs are indeterminate and
would depend on the current
capacity of the Legislative Council
to comply with the proposed bill’s
requirements; otherwise, additional funds could be necessary.
MINNESOTA

Bill number: SF 157/HF 278
Enacted: 3/14/2013
Effective: 1/1/2015

Minnesota Constitution

Laws of Minnesota

Minnesota Statutes

Minnesota Rules

No fiscal impact
NEVADA

Bill number: SB 105
Enacted: 5/23/2013
Effective: 1/1/2014

Nevada Constitution

Statutes of Nevada

Nevada Revised Statutes

Nevada Administrative Code

No fiscal impact
NORTH DAKOTA

Bill number: HB 1129
Enacted: 4/8/2013
Effective: 7/31/2013

North Dakota Constitution

North Dakota Century Code

Laws of North Dakota

North Dakota Administrative Code

$115,000 for the 2013-15
biennium. Of this amount,
$85,000 is one-time costs
relating to software
development and $30,000 is
ongoing costs each
biennium.
OHIO

Bill number: SB 139
Enacted: 6/29/2018
Effective: 9/28/2018

The Constitution of this state

The session laws of this state

The Revised Code

State agency rules that have or had the effect of law

The final decisions of state administrative agencies

In order to fulfill the
requirements of the bill, LSC
would likely have to contract
with a new vendor such as
LexisNexis or Westlaw. The
new contract to include
authentication services would
likely exceed $100,000
annually based on the bids
these vendors provided LSC
in the past regarding online
Revised Code and
Administrative Code
publishing.
OREGON

Bill number: HB 2944
Enacted: 5/23/2013
Effective: 5/23/2013

Oregon Constitution

Oregon Session Laws

Oregon Revised Statutes

Oregon Administrative Rules

Minimal fiscal impact
PENNSYLVANIA

Bill number: SB 601
Enacted: 9/24/2014
Effective: 11/23/2014

Pennsylvania Constitution

Laws of Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania Code

State agency regulations with effect of law

Reported decisions of Pennsylvania Supreme Court; Pennsylvania Superior
Court; Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court;
or a Pennsylvania court of common pleas

Rules of Pennsylvania court

No fiscal impact
TEXAS

Bill number: HB 402
Enacted: 5/24/2019
Effective: 9/1/2019

The constitution of this state

The general or special laws passed in a regular or special session of the Texas Legislature

A state agency rule adopted in accordance with Chapter 2001.

No significant fiscal impact
UTAH

Bill number: SB 121
Enacted: 3/15/2018
Effective: 1/1/2019

Utah Constitution

Laws of Utah

Utah Code

Utah Administrative Code

Utah State Bulletin

One-time cost of $178,000
$45,000 ongoing
U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS

Bill number: 34-0034
Enacted: 8/16/2021
Effective: 90 days after enactment

The Revised Organic Act of the Virgin Islands

The Session Laws of the Virgin Islands;

The Virgin Islands Code Annotated

The Code of the United States Virgin Islands Rules

The Opinions of the Attorney General of the Virgin Islands

Reported decisions of the following courts: the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands and the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands

Virgin Islands State Court Rules;

Virgin Islands Government Register

No fiscal note
WASHINGTON

Bill number: SB 5039
Enacted: 4/21/2017
Effective: 1/1/2018

Washington state Constitution

Session laws of the state of Washington

Revised Code of Washington

A state agency rule that has or had the effect of law

Washington State Register

Washington Administrative Code

No fiscal impact
WASHINGTON, DC

Bill number: 21-0890
Enacted: 4/2/2017
Effective: 7/1/2017

Acts and resolutions of the Council

District of Columbia Official Code

District of Columbia Municipal Regulations

Other legal materials designated by the Mayor by rule

Other legal materials designated by the Council by resolution

No fiscal impact
WEST VIRGINIA

Bill number: SB 214
Enacted: 4/9/2017
Effective: 7/2/2017

West Virginia Constitution

Acts of the Legislature

Code of West Virginia

All rules and other materials filed in the State Register

The state administrative agency decisions made pursuant to articles four and five, chapter twenty-nine-a of this code

No fiscal impact